In this course we have seen the
development and changes in different societies. We have discussed the factors
of the theory of value, impartial spectator, cost and labor, etc. In this post
I mainly am going to focus on Heilbroner’s chapter of “The Savage State of
Thorstein Veblen.” The behavior of society is dictated by our human dignity;
this is largely influenced by the views that others have. In his description of
the leisure class, he refers to the different values of goods; he states the
more expensive goods are better. From this I concluded that our human dignity
is based off society’s perspective of accumulation of wealth; meaning the more
material wealth people have, then the “better” they will feel about themselves
because that is society’s view. This relates to my topic of the development and
change of societies throughout time because some societies take pride in the
work that they have accomplished, not the wealth that they attain.
For example, American Indians
performed hands-on work to try to out-perform one another; they would base this
off their labor. Their pride came from work, whereas in society today the pride
comes from how much wealth one person has or the ability to buy expensive
goods. If someone in their society did not perform as expected, then they would
not receive the level of respect that could be obtained.
Society today has completely
changed; people heavily rely on technology and machinery rather than their own
sweat and labor. Veblen would consider this to be disgraceful due to the fact
that nowadays people are less willing to perform hard-working, hands-on tasks
then before. This reliance on machinery disables the working class to grow due
to the fact that people are more interested accumulation of wealth than taking
pride in the work that they have done. If more people were interested in
out-performing one another with their work, then it would lead to a
high-performance, full working class which would ultimately lead to a more
efficient economy.
The major
issue in society today is that people base their dignity and standing among
peers by the amount of luxury goods that they have. The main contributing
factor is technology; technology leads to mass production. Society is becoming
more of a “savage” state because they are more interested in making themselves
look better with their luxury goods and are too concerned about what other
people think. People today are not so focused on the quality of work the
produce due to the fact the technology enables them to produce in large
quantities at a similar quality.
My question is this; do you think
that people today are too focused on what other people think about their jobs,
wealth, and material goods and less focused on their productivity and
efficiency with work? With the view that society holds on importance of
flaunting the luxury and wealth, do you think that this will lead to a savage
economic state in which people care more about wealth than they do their work?
I think that it is obvious that people today are too focused on the acquisition of wealth. However, I am not sure if this obsession over jobs and wealth effects the focus on productivity and efficiency. In today's society, productivity and efficiency are necessary qualities to have to get ahead in the workplace. In order to acquire wealth, better jobs, and better possessions, one must improve their own productivity and efficiency. This improvement will allow individuals to move to higher positions within their companies, which then allows them to generate more wealth. I do not believe that people have lost focus on the importance of productivity and efficiency, however they may have lost focus on legitimacy and legality. Some individuals are attempting to get ahead in this world by stealing other individuals work and taking credit for it. They are also ignoring and circumventing laws in order to get ahead, ignoring the possible consequences of these actions. I think this is where the economy is hurt the most. Individuals in today's society have lost focus on the process of attaining wealth and power, and started to focus only on the end goal of the maximum possible wealth and power that they could attain. This is what is harming the efficiency of the current economic market.
ReplyDeleteBecker also talked about the value of "psychic income" in many jobs. Do you think that is present or may take the place of monetary income for many people?
ReplyDeleteThere is no need to respond to this as we are past the deadline for inclusion in the grade. However, you are more than welcome to continue the conversation through the end of this week.
Professor Schilling